Sanjian v. Ettinger
This text of 237 A.D. 853 (Sanjian v. Ettinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the City Court of [854]*854Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. The verdict of the jury was inadequate, and the motion for a new trial on that ground should have been granted. The appeal is properly here on this record. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 549, 580; Carmody New York Practice [Temporary ed.], § 436; Laws of 1930, chap. 852, § 11.
Amdg. Yonkers City Court Act (Laws of 1893, chap. 416), tit. 9, § 1, subds. 1, 8,— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanjian-v-ettinger-nyappdiv-1932.