Sanjeev Patel v. Suresh Kumar Shah, Paresha Shah, Neel Shah Hospitality Inc., SRP Hospitality, Inc., Lorrain Hospitality, Inc., RSP Hospitality, Inc., PMS Hospitality, Inc., ISHA Realty, Inc., Prakash Parikh, and Kokila Parikh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sanjeev Patel v. Suresh Kumar Shah, Paresha Shah, Neel Shah Hospitality Inc., SRP Hospitality, Inc., Lorrain Hospitality, Inc., RSP Hospitality, Inc., PMS Hospitality, Inc., ISHA Realty, Inc., Prakash Parikh, and Kokila Parikh

DecidedMarch 9, 2006

Docket14-05-01070-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sanjeev Patel v. Suresh Kumar Shah, Paresha Shah, Neel Shah Hospitality Inc., SRP Hospitality, Inc., Lorrain Hospitality, Inc., RSP Hospitality, Inc., PMS Hospitality, Inc., ISHA Realty, Inc., Prakash Parikh, and Kokila Parikh (Sanjeev Patel v. Suresh Kumar Shah, Paresha Shah, Neel Shah Hospitality Inc., SRP Hospitality, Inc., Lorrain Hospitality, Inc., RSP Hospitality, Inc., PMS Hospitality, Inc., ISHA Realty, Inc., Prakash Parikh, and Kokila Parikh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanjeev Patel v. Suresh Kumar Shah, Paresha Shah, Neel Shah Hospitality Inc., SRP Hospitality, Inc., Lorrain Hospitality, Inc., RSP Hospitality, Inc., PMS Hospitality, Inc., ISHA Realty, Inc., Prakash Parikh, and Kokila Parikh, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 9, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 9, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-01070-CV

SANJEEV PATEL, Appellant

V.

SURESH KUMAR SHAH, PARESHA SHAH, NEEL SHAH HOSPITALITY INC., SRP HOSPITALITY, INC., LORRAIN HOSPITALITY, INC., RSP HOSPITALITY, INC., PMS HOSPITALITY, INC., ISHA REALTY, INC., PRAKASH PARIKH, and KOKILA PARIKH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04-41280

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order, signed August 19, 2005, dissolving an agreed temporary injunction.

On February 13, 2006, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting that appellant no longer wished to appeal the agreed order of August 19, 2005, and that the remaining orders are interlocutory. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 9, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Edelman, and Frost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI