Sani-Porcelain Enamel Products, Inc. v. Bender Store Fixture Co.

251 A.D. 726, 295 N.Y.S. 411, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 726 (Sani-Porcelain Enamel Products, Inc. v. Bender Store Fixture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sani-Porcelain Enamel Products, Inc. v. Bender Store Fixture Co., 251 A.D. 726, 295 N.Y.S. 411, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

This is a consolidated action wherein appellant seeks to set aside a chattel mortgage made by defendant Bender Store Fixture Co., Inc., to respondent Delbick, and the latter seeks to foreclose the chattel mortgage and secure a personal judgment against appellant and the Bender Company. The Bender Company defaulted. Appellant, a judgment creditor, purchased the chattels at a marshal’s sale subject to the Delbick mortgage. The court dismissed appellant’s complaint and awarded judgment to Delbick against appellant for $900, the amount of the mortgage, in lieu of foreclosure. Judgment modified by strildng out the provision for a money judgment and directing that Delbick have judgment of foreclosure against appellant, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. While the evidence supports the finding that the mortgage was valid, there is no basis for awarding a money judgment. The chattels, with the exception of two which appellant has loaned' to one Simon, are in the actual possession of appellant, and these two are presently available and, therefore, they are not beyond Delbick’s reach so as to interfere with or destroy the lien of bis mortgage. Under these circumstances it was error to award respondent a money judgment. (Manning v. Monaghan, 23 N. Y. 539, 548; Norton v. Shields, 174 App. Div. 804.) Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting. Settle order on notice,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Progressive Credit Union v. Mount Vernon Wiping Cloth Corp.
5 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Abramson v. Held
263 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Swift & Co. v. Cohen
256 A.D. 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 726, 295 N.Y.S. 411, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sani-porcelain-enamel-products-inc-v-bender-store-fixture-co-nyappdiv-1937.