Sangster v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sangster v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.

545 S.W.3d 385

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2018·No. No. ED 105473·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antonia Sangster, Erika Sangster, and Amanda Sangster (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC (collectively "Defendants") on Plaintiffs' claims for wrongful death and negligence arising out of a fall that occurred on Defendants' property. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Antonia Sangster, Erika Sangster, and Amanda Sangster (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC (collectively "Defendants") on Plaintiffs' claims for wrongful death and negligence arising out of a fall that occurred on Defendants' property. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Sangster v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 545 S.W.3d 385 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

545 S.W.3d 385 (Sangster v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.