Sangester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sangester v. State

211 So. 2d 585, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1968

DocketNo. 67-1093

StatusPublished

This text of 211 So. 2d 585 (Sangester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sangester v. State, 211 So. 2d 585, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, tried by a jury and found guilty of robbery. [586]*586He appeals the judgment and sentence, contending the state failed to prove that he aided and abetted in the crime charged. Upon consideration of that contention in the light of the record and briefs, we conclude otherwise. In our view the evidence adequately supports the verdict and judgment. See Mallory v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 69.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against, tried by a jury and found guilty of robbery. [586]*586He appeals the judgment and sentence, contending the state failed to prove that he aided and abetted in the crime charged. Upon consideration of that contention in the light of the record and briefs, we conclude otherwise. In our view the evidence adequately supports the verdict and judgment. See Mallory v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 69.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 So. 2d 585, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sangester-v-state-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack