Sangester v. State
211 So. 2d 585, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467
Opinion
The appellant was informed against, tried by a jury and found guilty of robbery. [586] He appeals the judgment and sentence, contending the state failed to prove that he aided and abetted in the crime charged. Upon consideration of that contention in the light of the record and briefs, we conclude otherwise. In our view the evidence adequately supports the verdict and judgment. See Mallory v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 69.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sangester v. State, 211 So. 2d 585, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
211 So. 2d 585 (Sangester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mallory v. State
211 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)