Sanger v. Waterbury
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 895
This text of 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 895 (Sanger v. Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sanger v. Waterbury, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 895 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).
Opinion
A careful examination of the case and the authorities cited have failed to disclose any error. The judge who tried the case filed a carefully-prepared opinion, which meets fully the issue involved, and renders discussion now unnecessary.
We think the case must be affirmed upon the opinion below, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanger-v-waterbury-nysupct-1886.