Sanger v. Truesdail
8 Mich. 543
This text of 8 Mich. 543 (Sanger v. Truesdail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sanger v. Truesdail, 8 Mich. 543 (Mich. 1860).
Opinion
A plea in bar was interposed in Chancery, and the Circuit Judge, instead of passing upon it, reserved the question of its sufficiency for the opinion of the Supreme Court. — Held, that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction of the question; the Constitution having conferred upon it appellate jurisdiction only, except in certain specified cases, of which this was not one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Max
198 P. 150 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1921)
State v. Crocker
40 P. 681 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1895)
Jones v. Smith
14 Mich. 334 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1866)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Mich. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanger-v-truesdail-mich-1860.