Sanger v. Rovello
173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 7, 1909·No. No. 2,010·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff in error took no better title to the property purchased at execution sale than Peter McClellan had; and said Peter McClellan, as appears by the record, had no title subject to execution, as settled in the courts of the state of Texas long prior to plaintiff in error’s purchase. See McClelland v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 350; Wood v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S. W. 381; McClelland v. McClelland, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 26, 101 S. W. 1171. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanger v. Rovello, 173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137 (5th Cir. 1909).
173 F. 1022 (Sanger v. Rovello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoffman v. Rose
217 S.W. 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Lindsey v. Rose
175 S.W. 829 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)