Sanger v. Rovello

Fifth Circuit

Sanger v. Rovello

173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1909

DocketNo. 2,010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 173 F. 1022 (Sanger v. Rovello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanger v. Rovello, 173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137 (5th Cir. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error took no better title to the property purchased at execution sale than Peter McClellan had; and said Peter McClellan, as appears by the record, had no title subject to execution, as settled in the courts of the state of Texas long prior to plaintiff in error’s purchase. See McClelland v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 350; Wood v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S. W. 381; McClelland v. McClelland, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 26, 101 S. W. 1171. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error took no better title to the property purchased at execution sale than Peter McClellan had; and said Peter McClellan, as appears by the record, had no title subject to execution, as settled in the courts of the state of Texas long prior to plaintiff in error’s purchase. See McClelland v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 37 S. W. 350; Wood v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S. W. 381; McClelland v. McClelland, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 26, 101 S. W. 1171. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 F. 1022, 97 C.C.A. 669, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanger-v-rovello-ca5-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack