Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury

8 Mass. 265
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

We have no doubt that a person regularly engaged and officiating as a reader in an Episcopal society, is a public teacher of piety, religion, and morality, within the meaning and intent of the third article of our declaration of rights. Neither is it any objection to the plaintiff’s recovery in this case that his contract was semi-annual only, if, under such contracts, he had officiated for the whole of either of the years, for which the taxes claimed by him were paid. But as this was not the case, he cannot have judgment. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury, 8 Mass. 265 (Mass. 1811).

8 Mass. 265 (Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grubb v. Remington
7 Wis. 349 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)