Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury

8 Mass. 265
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Mass. 265 (Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanger v. Inhabitants of the Third Parish in Roxbury, 8 Mass. 265 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

By the Court.

We have no doubt that a person regularly engaged and officiating as a reader in an Episcopal society, is a public teacher of piety, religion, and morality, within the meaning and intent of the third article of our declaration of rights. Neither is it any objection to the plaintiff’s recovery in this case that his contract was semi-annual only, if, under such contracts, he had officiated for the whole of either of the years, for which the taxes claimed by him were paid. But as this was not the case, he cannot have judgment. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grubb v. Remington
7 Wis. 349 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanger-v-inhabitants-of-the-third-parish-in-roxbury-mass-1811.