Sanger Bros. v. Hunsucker

Supreme Court

Sanger Bros. v. Hunsucker

254 U.S. 621, 41 S. Ct. 320, 65 L. Ed. 443, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1273

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 24, 1921

DocketNo. 170

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 621 (Sanger Bros. v. Hunsucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanger Bros. v. Hunsucker, 254 U.S. 621, 41 S. Ct. 320, 65 L. Ed. 443, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1273 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second Supreme Judicial District, of the State of Texas. Submitted January 21, 1921; Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. Henry C. Coke for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Second Supreme Judicial District, of the State of Texas. Submitted January 21, 1921; Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. Henry C. Coke for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 621, 41 S. Ct. 320, 65 L. Ed. 443, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanger-bros-v-hunsucker-scotus-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack