Sanga v. Neptune Flood Incorporated

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedOctober 6, 2025
Docket8:25-cv-02679
StatusUnknown

This text of Sanga v. Neptune Flood Incorporated (Sanga v. Neptune Flood Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanga v. Neptune Flood Incorporated, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BERNARD JOSEPH TALAGA SANGA and MARGARETTE ANNE TENG SANGA,

Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 8:25-cv-2679-WFJ-CPT NEPTUNE FLOOD INCORPORATED d/b/a INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. /

HURRICANE SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 16 and consistent with Rule 1’s commitment to the prompt, fair, and efficient resolution of this action, this order implements a case management plan tailored to the circumstances of an insurance dispute about property damage caused by the hurricane(s) at issue in this suit. At any time, the parties may consent to proceed—for all purposes—before the assigned Magistrate Judge by filing an AO 85 form available on the court’s website. 1 See Rule 73(b)(2). And should the parties resolve the dispute at any time, they shall immediately file an appropriate paper to terminate this action.2

Within 14 days of a Response to the Complaint, the parties shall jointly file a certification they are familiar with and will abide by the court’s local rules and the orders entered as of their certification date in this matter.

Throughout this order, the term “Response to the Complaint” means the notice of removal, or—when the case is initiated here—the first answer or Rule 12 motion of the last defendant to file one.

1 The presiding judges’ webpages also disclose judge-specific preferences and requirements. 2 See also Local Rule 3.09 (requiring notice of any agreement to resolve any part of the action even if contingent or unwritten). Except as stated in this order, all disclosure obligations, and discovery are STAYED. 3 By stipulation, the parties may extend or narrow the scope of automatic discovery set forth in sections IV and V below. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 29(b). The parties may also agree to the service of non-party subpoenas for documents or testimony.

I. Appraisal

Any motion for appraisal must be filed no later than 21 days after a Response to the Complaint is filed. Filing a motion for appraisal tolls the deadlines in this order. If the parties agree that appraisal is appropriate, they should stipulate, and the case will be stayed.

When conferring about appraisal, the parties should consider the “overwhelming preference in Florida for the resolution of conflicts through any extra-judicial means . . . for which the parties have themselves contracted.” McGowan v. First Acceptance Ins. Co., Inc., 411 F. Supp. 3d 1293, 1296 (M.D. Fla. 2019) (quoting State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Middleton, 648 So. 2d 1200, 1201-1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)). When an insurance policy contains an appraisal provision, “the right to appraisal is not permissive but is instead mandatory, so once a demand for appraisal is made, ‘neither party has the right to deny that demand.’” McGowan, 411 F. Supp. 3d at 1296 (quoting United Cmty. Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 642 So. 2d 59, 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)). And like other stipulations about dispute resolution, the court enforces contractual appraisal provisions by non-dispositive order. See Positano Place at Naples II Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:21-cv-181-SPC-MRM, 2022 WL 714809, *2 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2022) (“[B]ecause appraisal will not dispose of any claims or defenses, the Court does not treat the motion to compel appraisal as one for summary judgment.”) (citing Waterford Condo. Ass’n of Collier Cty., Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:19-cv-81-FtM-38-NPM, 2019 WL 3852731, *2 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 16, 2019)).

Motions to compel appraisal, to appoint an umpire for an appraisal, or to compel discovery to inform an appraisal may be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. See Milligan v. CCC Info. Servs. Inc., 920 F.3d 146, 152 (2d Cir. 2019) (appraisal constitutes an arbitration for purposes of the FAA); Martinique Properties, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 567 F. Supp. 3d 1099, 1106 (D. Neb. 2021), aff’d sub nom., 60 F.4th 1206 (8th Cir. 2023) (same); Register v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, No. 5:20-cv-52-TKW-

3 The stay encompasses the Rule 26(f) discovery conference. MJF, 2020 WL 6106624, *3 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2020) (same for another federal arbitration statute); Liberty Mut. Grp., Inc. v. Wright, No. CIV.A. DKC 12- 0282, 2012 WL 718857, *6 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2012) (requests to appoint an appraisal umpire are processed as motions under the FAA); see also Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp., 374 F.3d 1, 7 (1st Cir. 2004) (an agreed method to reach a binding resolution by a third-party neutral about a fact in dispute constitutes an arbitration for purposes of the FAA).

II. Motions to Amend

Any motion to amend a pleading or join a party must be filed no later than 60 days after a Response to the Complaint has been filed.

III. Automatic Discovery

A. Initial Disclosures

To facilitate the parties’ necessary evaluation and potential resolution of this action before the court’s initial case management conference, this order requires the automatic disclosure of certain information and documents in an expedited manner. These requirements are limited to information and documents not subject to objection. But unlike disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) these automatic disclosures include favorable as well as unfavorable information and documents. The provisions of this order replace the initial- disclosure requirements of Rule 26(a)(1).4

B. Definitions

1. “Any” means “all” and refers to every one of the available items rather than a subset of them. 2. “Claimed Loss” means the loss or damage that the Insured seeks to recover from the Insurer. 3. “Document” and “documents” are defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the phrase “documents or electronically stored information” in Rule 34(a)(1)(A). A draft

4 Nothing in this Hurricane Scheduling Order shall be construed as precluding a party from offering additional information that the party may reasonably consider helpful for evaluating the legal and factual contentions at issue in the litigation. of a document or a nonidentical copy is a separate document. 4. “Event” means the disaster(s) alleged to have caused the Insured’s Claimed Loss. 5. When referring to documents, to “identify” means to describe, to the extent known: (i) the type of document; (ii) the general subject matter; (iii) the date; (iv) the author(s), according to the document; and (v) the person(s) to whom, according to the document, the document (or a copy) was to have been sent. Alternatively, to “identify” a document means to produce a copy. 6. When referring to natural persons, to “identify” means to give the person’s: (i) full name; (ii) present or last known address and telephone number; (iii) present or last known email address; (iv) present or last known place of employment; (v) present or last known job title; and (vi) relationship, if any, to the parties. Once a person has been identified under this subparagraph, only the name of that person need be listed in response to later requests to identify that person. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Community Ins. Co. v. Lewis
642 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Middleton
648 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Milligan v. CCC Info. Servs. Inc.
920 F.3d 146 (Second Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanga v. Neptune Flood Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanga-v-neptune-flood-incorporated-flmd-2025.