Sang Xuan Dang v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
538 U.S. 985, 123 S. Ct. 1796, 155 L. Ed. 2d 678, 71 U.S.L.W. 3666, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3061
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 2003
Docket02-9074
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases
This text of 538 U.S. 985 (Sang Xuan Dang v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sang Xuan Dang v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, 538 U.S. 985, 123 S. Ct. 1796, 155 L. Ed. 2d 678, 71 U.S.L.W. 3666, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3061 (2003).
Opinion
538 U.S. 985
SANG XUAN DANG
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 02-9074.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 21, 2003.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. Royal
866 F.3d 1164 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
Lott v. Trammell
705 F.3d 1167 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)
Murphy v. Sirmons
497 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (E.D. Oklahoma, 2007)
Rojem v. State
2006 OK CR 7 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2006)
Thacker v. State
2005 OK CR 18 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)
Garrison v. State
2004 OK CR 35 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2004)
Lott v. State
2004 OK CR 27 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2004)
Primeaux v. State
2004 OK CR 16 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
538 U.S. 985, 123 S. Ct. 1796, 155 L. Ed. 2d 678, 71 U.S.L.W. 3666, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sang-xuan-dang-v-cockrell-director-texas-department-of-criminal-justice-scotus-2003.