Sanford v. Lassiter

Fourth Circuit

Sanford v. Lassiter

607 F. App'x 345

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2015·No. No. 15-6177·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lewis Sanford appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanford v. Lassiter, No. 5:13-ct-03138-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[346] tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lewis Sanford appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanford v. Lassiter, No. 5:13-ct-03138-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[346] tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sanford v. Lassiter, 607 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

607 F. App'x 345 (Sanford v. Lassiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related