Sanford v. Kaercher

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sanford v. Kaercher

12 A.2d 676, 127 N.J. Eq. 277, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 610

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 25, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.2d 676 (Sanford v. Kaercher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford v. Kaercher, 12 A.2d 676, 127 N.J. Eq. 277, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 610 (N.J. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow and reported in 126 N. J. Eq. 391.

We find no abuse of discretion in the allowance of counsel fees and costs to be paid out of the John C. Marsh share of the Sarah W. Marsh estate.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteibld, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Donges, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI