Sanford v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sanford v. Hart

168 A.D. 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 890 (Sanford v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford v. Hart, 168 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually, for the recovery of a sum of money, and the defendant Max M. Hart, not having answered that complaint, is in default, and the plaintiff is entitled, as matter of right, upon that default, to relief as against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually. We are entirely satisfied with the disposition by the trial judge of the cause of action alleged against Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe. The judgment appealed from must be modified by directing a recovery against M. M. Hart (Inc.), and Max M. Hart, individually, for the sum of $2,808.50, and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with costs to defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually, for the recovery of a sum of money, and the defendant Max M. Hart, not having answered that complaint, is in default, and the plaintiff is entitled, as matter of right, upon that default, to relief as against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually. We are entirely satisfied with the disposition by the trial judge of the cause of action alleged against Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe. The judgment appealed from must be modified by directing a recovery against M. M. Hart (Inc.), and Max M. Hart, individually, for the sum of $2,808.50, and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with costs to defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-v-hart-nyappdiv-1915.