Sanford v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Sanford v. Hall

5 Ky. Op. 287, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 380

DecidedJanuary 31, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 287 (Sanford v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford v. Hall, 5 Ky. Op. 287, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 380 (Ky. Ct. App. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

As the jury did not find for Hall on his counter-claim, the instruction on that branch of the case did not injuriously affect appellant’s substantial rights.

We do not think that the admission of the objectionable evidence of the witness, McCloud, sufficient of itself to authorize the disturbance of the verdict of the jury. The more especially as we are of the opinion that said verdict would have been in accordance with the weight of the testimony, even if all the evidence of McCloud had been excluded.

Judgment affirmed-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

As the jury did not find for Hall on his counter-claim, the instruction on that branch of the case did not injuriously affect appellant’s substantial rights.

We do not think that the admission of the objectionable evidence of the witness, McCloud, sufficient of itself to authorize the disturbance of the verdict of the jury. The more especially as we are of the opinion that said verdict would have been in accordance with the weight of the testimony, even if all the evidence of McCloud had been excluded.

Judgment affirmed-.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ky. Op. 287, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-v-hall-kyctapp-1871.