Sanford v. Dormire

372 S.W.3d 921, 2012 WL 3288644, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 994
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. WD 74965·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Marshall Sanford is incarcerated at the Jefferson City Correctional Center. He filed suit against Dave Dormiré, then the warden of the prison, alleging claims concerning the prison’s disciplinary and grievance procedures. The trial court dismissed three of Sanford’s claims because the petition failed to allege facts establishing that Sanford had standing to pursue the claims. The court granted Dormiré judgment on the pleadings on the merits of a fourth claim, and dismissed Sanford’s fifth claim for failure to state a claim. Sanford appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanford v. Dormire, 372 S.W.3d 921, 2012 WL 3288644, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 994 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

372 S.W.3d 921 (Sanford v. Dormire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.