Sanford Trails Development, Inc. v. Central Orlando Paving Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanford Trails Development, Inc. v. Central Orlando Paving Co.

708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 1998 WL 210303

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1445

StatusPublished

This text of 708 So. 2d 701 (Sanford Trails Development, Inc. v. Central Orlando Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford Trails Development, Inc. v. Central Orlando Paving Co., 708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 1998 WL 210303 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

The trial court found an equitable lien in favor of Central Orlando Paving Company, Inc. and permitted its foreclosure. We affirm the court’s decision except its determination of the amount of set-off due Sanford Trails Development, Inc. because of the property it conveyed to various creditors of Central Orlando to satisfy obligations owed by Central Orlando. The court should credit against the debt owed by Sanford Trails the total amount of the Central Orlando’s obligation satisfied by the conveyance of property.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

The trial court found an equitable lien in favor of Central Orlando Paving Company, Inc. and permitted its foreclosure. We affirm the court’s decision except its determination of the amount of set-off due Sanford Trails Development, Inc. because of the property it conveyed to various creditors of Central Orlando to satisfy obligations owed by Central Orlando. The court should credit against the debt owed by Sanford Trails the total amount of the Central Orlando’s obligation satisfied by the conveyance of property.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4805, 1998 WL 210303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-trails-development-inc-v-central-orlando-paving-co-fladistctapp-1998.