Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund

Michigan Supreme Court

Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

Docket151367

StatusPublished

This text of Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund (Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund, (Mich. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 3, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151367 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein SANFORD N. LAKIN and CECILIA J. Joan L. Larsen, LAKIN, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 151367 COA: 323695 Oakland CC: 2014-138683-NO BARBARA RUND and ST. HUGO OF THE HILLS CATHOLIC CHURCH, Defendants-Appellants, and ANTHONY TOCCO, Defendant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider (1) whether publication of an allegedly false and defamatory statement imputing to another conduct constituting the criminal offense of battery is actionable irrespective of special harm, see e.g., Mains v Whiting, 87 Mich 172, 180 (1891); Taylor v Kneeland, 1 Doug 67, 72 (1843) (holding that words charging a person with a crime are not actionable per se unless the crime involves moral turpitude or would subject the person to an infamous punishment); and (2) whether the statement at issue in this case imputed to the plaintiff the criminal offense of battery.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 3, 2016 d0127 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 3, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151367 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein SANFORD N. LAKIN and CECILIA J. Joan L. Larsen, LAKIN, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 151367 COA: 323695 Oakland CC: 2014-138683-NO BARBARA RUND and ST. HUGO OF THE HILLS CATHOLIC CHURCH, Defendants-Appellants, and ANTHONY TOCCO, Defendant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider (1) whether publication of an allegedly false and defamatory statement imputing to another conduct constituting the criminal offense of battery is actionable irrespective of special harm, see e.g., Mains v Whiting, 87 Mich 172, 180 (1891); Taylor v Kneeland, 1 Doug 67, 72 (1843) (holding that words charging a person with a crime are not actionable per se unless the crime involves moral turpitude or would subject the person to an infamous punishment); and (2) whether the statement at issue in this case imputed to the plaintiff the criminal offense of battery.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 3, 2016 d0127 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sanford N Lakin v. Barbara Rund, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-n-lakin-v-barbara-rund-mich-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack