Sandyland Produce, LLC. v. Tar Heel Farms, Inc.
This text of Sandyland Produce, LLC. v. Tar Heel Farms, Inc. (Sandyland Produce, LLC. v. Tar Heel Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 04-16340 APRIL 12, 2006 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 02-01515-CV-ORL-31JGG
SANDYLAND PRODUCE, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAR HEEL FARMS, INC., a Florida Corporation, SCOTT S. PAINTER, an individual,
Defendants-Appellants,
AMBROSIA FARMS OF POMPANO BEACH, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________
(April 12, 2006) Before CARNES, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After a careful consideration of the briefs, review of the record on appeal,
and having heard oral argument in the matter, we conclude that the judgment in
this case should be affirmed on the basis of the district court’s opinion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sandyland Produce, LLC. v. Tar Heel Farms, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandyland-produce-llc-v-tar-heel-farms-inc-ca11-2006.