Sandy v. Select Portfolio Serv., Inc.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: February 28, 2017
• Docket: 72364
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BAYARDO RENO SANDY, No. 72364 Appellant, vs. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; BNY MELLON; AND WRIGHT, FILE FINLEY & ZAK, LLP, HOLDERS OF ALTERNATIVE TRUST 2007-HY2, FEB 2 8 2017 Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration, a motion to strike, a motion to quash, and a motion to revoke a foreclosure sale. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reconsideration, a motion to strike, a motion to quash, or a motion to revoke a foreclosure sale. See, e.g., Arnold v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 417, 168 P.3d 1050, 1054 (2007); Jarstad

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A v. Nat'l Farmers Union, 92 Nev. 380, 552 P.2d 49 (1976). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

**Sra Parraguirre

J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Bayardo Reno Sandy Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

Al) I947A 9)(7044) 2