Sandusky v. Commonwealth
272 S.W.2d 802, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1129
Opinion
We are affirming the judgment in this case for a $50 fine and 60 days in jail because we think (1) the use of the word ‘.‘liquor” in the warrant was sufficient to inform the-appellánt of the nature of the [803] charge against him; and (2) the affidavit in support of the search warrant was regular on its face.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sandusky v. Commonwealth, 272 S.W.2d 802, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1129 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).
272 S.W.2d 802 (Sandusky v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.