Sandstrom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Sandstrom v. State

238 S.W. 226, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 762

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1922·No. No. 6774·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction was under article 500, Vernon’s.P. C., charging appellant with beeping a ‘Tiawdyhouse.” Punishment [227]*227was assessed at a fine of $200 and 20 days in jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The motion for new trial ratees only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and in its absence presents nothing for review. The proceedings appear regular, and in the condition of the record all things' must be presumed as to the correctness of the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction was under article 500, Vernon’s.P. C., charging appellant with beeping a ‘Tiawdyhouse.” Punishment [227]*227was assessed at a fine of $200 and 20 days in jail.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The motion for new trial ratees only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and in its absence presents nothing for review. The proceedings appear regular, and in the condition of the record all things' must be presumed as to the correctness of the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Sandstrom v. State, 238 S.W. 226, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 762 (Tex. 1922).

Pincite

238 S.W. 226 (Sandstrom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.