Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale

250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6288

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 20, 1971

DocketNo. 71-281

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 So. 2d 341 (Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Sandstrom was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Fort Lau-derdale of engaging in the occupation of attorney-at-law without first having obtain[342]*342ed a municipal occupational license as required by ordinance. The conviction was affirmed on appeal to the circuit court, and a further appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in the cause being transferred to this court for disposition. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same upon the authority of Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 755; Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Amos, 1932, 104 Fla. 609, 141 So. 153; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell, 1914, 233 U.S. 304, 34 S.Ct. 493, 58 L.Ed. 974; Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 1910, 217 U.S. 114, 30 S.Ct. 496, 54 L.Ed. 688; Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, 8 Cir. 1931, 50 F.2d 670; Kaufman v. City of Tucson, 1967, 6 Ariz.App. 429, 433 P.2d 282; Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of Bakersfield, 36 Cal.2d 136, 222 P.2d 879, and 9 McQuillin, Law of Municipal Corporations, 3rd Edition, § 26.60.

Certiorari denied.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Sandstrom was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Fort Lau-derdale of engaging in the occupation of attorney-at-law without first having obtain[342]*342ed a municipal occupational license as required by ordinance. The conviction was affirmed on appeal to the circuit court, and a further appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in the cause being transferred to this court for disposition. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same upon the authority of Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 755; Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Amos, 1932, 104 Fla. 609, 141 So. 153; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell, 1914, 233 U.S. 304, 34 S.Ct. 493, 58 L.Ed. 974; Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 1910, 217 U.S. 114, 30 S.Ct. 496, 54 L.Ed. 688; Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, 8 Cir. 1931, 50 F.2d 670; Kaufman v. City of Tucson, 1967, 6 Ariz.App. 429, 433 P.2d 282; Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of Bakersfield, 36 Cal.2d 136, 222 P.2d 879, and 9 McQuillin, Law of Municipal Corporations, 3rd Edition, § 26.60.

Certiorari denied.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 So. 2d 341, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandstrom-v-city-of-fort-lauderdale-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack