Sands v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sands v. State

1919 OK CR 291, 183 P. 429, 16 Okla. Crim. 715, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 21, 1919

DocketNo. A-3268.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 291 (Sands v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sands v. State, 1919 OK CR 291, 183 P. 429, 16 Okla. Crim. 715, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district ' court' of Greer county of the offense of having in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same.

It is-alleged in the information that he had been previously convicted in the county court of Greer county of the offense of selling whisky. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appeals.

The only evidence is that introduced by the state, and it is ample to sustain the verdict. Discovering no prejudicial error in the record,, the judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district ' court' of Greer county of the offense of having in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same.

It is-alleged in the information that he had been previously convicted in the county court of Greer county of the offense of selling whisky. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict, and he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appeals.

The only evidence is that introduced by the state, and it is ample to sustain the verdict. Discovering no prejudicial error in the record,, the judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 291, 183 P. 429, 16 Okla. Crim. 715, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.