Sands v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sands v. State

682 So. 2d 702, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 1996 WL 661772

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2830

StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 702 (Sands v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sands v. State, 682 So. 2d 702, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 1996 WL 661772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We remand, however, so that the court may vacate defendant’s firearm conviction. The record reveals that the trial court failed to follow this court’s mandate in Sands v. State, 547 So.2d 293, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), [703]*703wherein we “vaeate[d] the defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.”

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We remand, however, so that the court may vacate defendant’s firearm conviction. The record reveals that the trial court failed to follow this court’s mandate in Sands v. State, 547 So.2d 293, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), [703]*703wherein we “vaeate[d] the defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.”

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 So. 2d 702, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 1996 WL 661772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack