Sands v. State
682 So. 2d 702, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 1996 WL 661772
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We remand, however, so that the court may vacate defendant’s firearm conviction. The record reveals that the trial court failed to follow this court’s mandate in Sands v. State, 547 So.2d 293, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), [703] wherein we “vaeate[d] the defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.”
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sands v. State, 682 So. 2d 702, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 1996 WL 661772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
682 So. 2d 702 (Sands v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sands v. State
547 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)