Sands v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sands v. State

358 So. 2d 1189, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16007

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1834

StatusPublished

This text of 358 So. 2d 1189 (Sands v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sands v. State, 358 So. 2d 1189, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16007 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Kermit T. Sands, was found guilty of the sale of a controlled substance. On appeal, the judgment and sentence were affirmed. See Sands v. State, 341 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The present appeal is from the denial of his motion to vacate pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The motion was properly denied under the law as set forth in Robinson v. Wainwright, 240 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). See also Arizona v. Washington, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 824, 54 L.Ed.2d 717 (1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Kermit T. Sands, was found guilty of the sale of a controlled substance. On appeal, the judgment and sentence were affirmed. See Sands v. State, 341 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The present appeal is from the denial of his motion to vacate pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The motion was properly denied under the law as set forth in Robinson v. Wainwright, 240 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). See also Arizona v. Washington, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 824, 54 L.Ed.2d 717 (1978).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 So. 2d 1189, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack