Sands v. Sands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sands v. Sands

273 A.D. 872, 76 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 872 (Sands v. Sands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sands v. Sands, 273 A.D. 872, 76 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Domestic Belations Court of the City of New York (Family Court), County of Kings, directing, as amended, appellant to pay $50 a month toward the support of a grandchild, reversed on the law and the facts and the proceeding dismissed, without costs. There is no proof in this record that the child is likely to become a public charge or that its parents are without means or are unable to earn sufficient to support the child. (N. Y. City Dom. Bel. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. 2; L. 1933, ch. 482.) In the absence of such proof a grandparent, whose statutory liability is secondary (N. Y. City Dom. Bel. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. 3), may not be required to make payments for the support of such a grandchild. (Matter of LarTcin v. Larkin, 262 App. Div. 868.) Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Domestic Belations Court of the City of New York (Family Court), County of Kings, directing, as amended, appellant to pay $50 a month toward the support of a grandchild, reversed on the law and the facts and the proceeding dismissed, without costs. There is no proof in this record that the child is likely to become a public charge or that its parents are without means or are unable to earn sufficient to support the child. (N. Y. City Dom. Bel. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. 2; L. 1933, ch. 482.) In the absence of such proof a grandparent, whose statutory liability is secondary (N. Y. City Dom. Bel. Ct. Act, § 101, subd. 3), may not be required to make payments for the support of such a grandchild. (Matter of LarTcin v. Larkin, 262 App. Div. 868.) Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 872, 76 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-sands-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack