Sands v. Gambs

64 N.W. 741, 106 Mich. 362, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1007
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 26, 1895·Published

Opinion

Montgomery, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiff recovered by direction of the court, and defendants bring error.

In September, 1863, Filer & Smith were the owners of lot 6, section 1, town 21 N., range 17 W., and platted a portion of the same as an addition to the village of Manistee. Upon the recorded plat, all the portion adjoining [364]*364the river, consisting of a continuous parcel east, north, and west of the lots and blocks, was marked as reserved, the other boundary of the reserve being Manistee river. In 18C8, the title to this reserve had been vested in M. S. Tyson & Oo., and they platted a portion of the same. The plat is as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sands v. Gambs, 64 N.W. 741, 106 Mich. 362, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 1007 (Mich. 1895).

64 N.W. 741 (Sands v. Gambs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilman v. Riopelle
18 Mich. 145 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1869)
Watson v. Peters
26 Mich. 508 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1873)
Turner v. Holland
33 N.W. 283 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Butler v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad
48 N.W. 569 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)