Sands v. Dysthe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Sands v. Dysthe

159 N.W. 629, 134 Minn. 290, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 636

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 20, 1916

DocketNos. 19,774—(29)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 N.W. 629 (Sands v. Dysthe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sands v. Dysthe, 159 N.W. 629, 134 Minn. 290, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 636 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order in judicial ditch proceeding dismissing appellant’s demand for a jury trial.

The demand is substantially in the form of that of the appellant in Asquith v. Engstrom, 133 Minn. 113, 157 N. W. 1004, decided since' this appeal was taken. The demand does not describe the land but the description is ascertainable by referring to the assessment which is a part of the record. Following the case cited we hold the demand sufficient. No statutory costs will be allowed.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order in judicial ditch proceeding dismissing appellant’s demand for a jury trial.

The demand is substantially in the form of that of the appellant in Asquith v. Engstrom, 133 Minn. 113, 157 N. W. 1004, decided since' this appeal was taken. The demand does not describe the land but the description is ascertainable by referring to the assessment which is a part of the record. Following the case cited we hold the demand sufficient. No statutory costs will be allowed.

Order reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 N.W. 629, 134 Minn. 290, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-dysthe-minn-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack