Sands v. Deutsche Bank
This text of 251 So. 3d 359 (Sands v. Deutsche Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
LINDA M. SANDS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-1213
DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 31, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge.
Patrick J. Deese, of Patrick J. Deese, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.
David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras, and Jarrett Cooper, of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Linda Sands, appeals the Final Judgment of Foreclosure entered in
favor of Appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Appellant alleges that
Appellee lacked standing to foreclose and failed to present competent, substantial
evidence to support the amount awarded in the Final Judgment. Appellee acknowledges
that reversal in part is required because the amount awarded for attorney’s fees was not supported by testimony from an attorney regarding the work done in this case. Therefore,
we reverse the amount awarded in attorney's fees and remand with instructions to the
trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasonableness of the rate
and time claimed. See Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So. 3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2016) (reversing portion of final judgment awarding attorney's fees where attorney's
fees affidavit filed before trial was insufficient to support fee award and trial court failed to
hold evidentiary hearing); Newman v. Newman, 121 So. 3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
(reversing award of attorney's fees where court failed to hold hearing and allow appellant
opportunity to dispute reasonableness of rate and time claimed). We affirm without
discussion the remaining issues on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 So. 3d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-deutsche-bank-fladistctapp-2018.