Sands v. Deutsche Bank

251 So. 3d 359
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 27, 2018
Docket5D17-1213
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 So. 3d 359 (Sands v. Deutsche Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sands v. Deutsche Bank, 251 So. 3d 359 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LINDA M. SANDS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-1213

DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge.

Patrick J. Deese, of Patrick J. Deese, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras, and Jarrett Cooper, of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Linda Sands, appeals the Final Judgment of Foreclosure entered in

favor of Appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Appellant alleges that

Appellee lacked standing to foreclose and failed to present competent, substantial

evidence to support the amount awarded in the Final Judgment. Appellee acknowledges

that reversal in part is required because the amount awarded for attorney’s fees was not supported by testimony from an attorney regarding the work done in this case. Therefore,

we reverse the amount awarded in attorney's fees and remand with instructions to the

trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasonableness of the rate

and time claimed. See Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So. 3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2016) (reversing portion of final judgment awarding attorney's fees where attorney's

fees affidavit filed before trial was insufficient to support fee award and trial court failed to

hold evidentiary hearing); Newman v. Newman, 121 So. 3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)

(reversing award of attorney's fees where court failed to hold hearing and allow appellant

opportunity to dispute reasonableness of rate and time claimed). We affirm without

discussion the remaining issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 So. 3d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-deutsche-bank-fladistctapp-2018.