Sands v. City of Rochester
This text of 38 A.D.3d 1174 (Sands v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered November 10, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking, inter alia, to compel respondents to conduct a hearing to determine his eligibility for medical and disability benefits. Petitioner’s initial application for medical and disability benefits was denied and petitioner took an administrative appeal from that determination. Without determining the merits of the administrative appeal, respondent Fire Chief reconsidered petitioner’s application and granted it only with respect to medical benefits.
Subsequently, petitioner again applied for benefits for the original injury, and his application was again approved only [1175]*1175with respect to medical benefits. Petitioner did not take an administrative appeal from that determination and thus failed to exhaust his administrative remedies (see Matter of Hoffman v City of Yonkers, 231 AD2d 520 [1996]; see generally Young Men’s Christian Assn. v Rochester Pure Waters Dist., 37 NY2d 371, 375 [1975]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.3d 1174, 831 N.Y.S.2d 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-2007.