Sands v. Bird

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. Cas. 105, 1 Johns. Cas. 394
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 107 (Sands v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sands v. Bird, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. Cas. 105, 1 Johns. Cas. 394 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The delay in the cause has been owing to the plaintiffs; nor Has the defendant ever put it off. The cause is now ready to come before the r.eferees, and this application is to be considered in the same light with the first application to put off a trial on account of absence of a material witness. It comes within the settled practice. The power given by the act to the defendant to take out a commission is in his favour, and an omission to do it cannot alter the ordinary practice,

Let the defendant have the effect of his motion to fhe extent of two months, unless the witness returns sooner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 107, 1 Cole. Cas. 105, 1 Johns. Cas. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sands-v-bird-nysupct-1800.