Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth v. Thrasher
This text of Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth v. Thrasher (Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth v. Thrasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SANDEE BRYAN MARION FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. HOTTLE CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF COURT KAREN ANGELINI 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 MARIALYN BARNARD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 REBECA C. MARTINEZ WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX TELEPHONE PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ (210) 335-2635 LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA JASON PULLIAM FACSIMILE NO. JUSTICES (210) 335-2762
March 11, 2015
Sandra Y. Espinoza Ruth V. Thrasher 326 Riverside Dr., Lot 10 4927 Benham Dr. San Antonio, TX 78210 San Antonio, TX 78220
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00144-CV Trial Court Case Number: 391870 Style: Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth V. Thrasher
The Court has this date issued the Mandate in the above styled and numbered cause.
Very truly yours, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK
____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853 MANDATE
THE STATE OF TEXAS
TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:
Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 31, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between
Sandra Y. Espinoza, Appellant
V.
Ruth V. Thrasher, Appellee
No. 04-14-00144-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 391870
was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:
In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. No costs of appeal are assessed against Appellant Sandra Y. Espinoza.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on March 11, 2015.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK
____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853 BILL OF COSTS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO
No. 04-14-00144-CV
Sandra Y. Espinoza
Ruth V. Thrasher
(NO. 391870 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BEXAR COUNTY)
TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY CLERK'S RECORD $175.00 INDIGENT FILING $195.00 INDIGENT N/A
Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00
Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.
I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this March 11, 2015.
____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth v. Thrasher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-y-espinoza-v-ruth-v-thrasher-texapp-2015.