Sandra L. Sims v. Tina Thomas and Simone Johnson
This text of Sandra L. Sims v. Tina Thomas and Simone Johnson (Sandra L. Sims v. Tina Thomas and Simone Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 25, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00092-CV
SANDRA L. SIMS, Appellant V. TINA THOMAS AND SIMONE JOHNSON, Appellees
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16409
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Goldstein, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns For the second time, appellant attempts to appeal the trial court’s August 24,
2017 judgment. In 2018, appellant filed a restricted appeal challenging both the
August 24 judgment and a January 22, 2018 order authorizing sale of property.1 See
Sims v. Thomas, 584 S.W.3d 880 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2019, no pet.). We dismissed
the portion of that appeal related to the August 24 judgment as untimely and
considered only the merits of the January 22 order. See id. at 882.
1 The notice of restricted appeal was filed on June 21, 2018. Because appellant’s new notice of appeal was filed more than five years past
the deadline, we again questioned our jurisdiction of the appeal of the August 24
judgment and instructed appellant to file a letter brief with an opportunity for
appellees to respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Following her initial letter brief,
appellant filed an amended notice of appeal and further letter brief asking that we
construe this appeal as a motion for rehearing of the prior appeal regarding the
August 2017 judgment only. This we cannot do. The time for reconsideration of
this Court’s order dismissing the appeal as it related to the August 24 judgment or
reconsidering the opinion in that appeal has passed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1 (motion
for rehearing due within fifteen days of the judgment).
Because the notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney,
L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g)
(timely filing of notice of appeal jurisdictional).
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
220092F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SANDRA L. SIMS, Appellant On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-22-00092-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16409. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice TINA THOMAS AND SIMONE Burns. Justices Goldstein and Smith JOHNSON, Appellees participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellees TINA THOMAS AND SIMONE JOHNSON recover their costs of this appeal from appellant SANDRA L. SIMS.
Judgment entered April 25, 2022
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sandra L. Sims v. Tina Thomas and Simone Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-l-sims-v-tina-thomas-and-simone-johnson-texapp-2022.