Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs
Opinion
121 F.3d 168
Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-30178.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 1997.
Marian M. Livaudais, Livaudais & Livaudais, Mandeville, LA, James F. Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Susan Rees, Plan Benefits Security Division, N-4611, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for Dept. of Labor, Amicus Curiae.
Thomas F. Boggs, Monroe, LA, Pro Se.
Guy L. Deano, Jr., Deano & Deano, Mandeville, LA, for Harry Boggs & David Boggs.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Before WISDOM, KING and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court's order granting summary judgment in the above-styled action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Boggs v. Boggs, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
121 F.3d 168 (Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.