Sandra J. Scott v. Dr. Gerald B. Calia

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided July 2, 1997·No. 03A01-9608-CV-00270·Published

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON FILED July 2, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk

SANDRA J . SCOTT ) ANDERSON COUNTY ) 03A01- 9608- CV- 00270 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt )

) )

v. ) HON. J AMES B. SCOTT, J R. , ) J UDGE )

DR. GERALD B. CALI A )

)

De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e ) VACATED AND REMANDED

KENNETH K. KENNEDY OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLANT

MARTI N L. ELLI S a nd VONDA M LAUGHLI N OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLEE .

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Thi s me di c a l ma l pr a c t i c e s ui t a r i s e s out of s ur ge r y

p e r f o r me d on Sa ndr a Sc ot t ’ s f e e t by Dr . Ge r a l d Ca l i a on M y 17 ,

a

1989. M . Sc ot t c ont e nds t ha t Dr . Ca l i a wa s ne gl i ge nt i n hi s

s

me di c a l c a r e of h e r . She i ns i s t s on a ppe a l t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t

wa s i n e r r or i n d i r e c t i ng a ve r di c t a ga i ns t he r a t t he c l os e of

h e r p r o of .

M . Sc ot t r a i s e s t he f ol l owi ng t wo i s s ue s on a ppe a l :

s

I. Di d t he t r i a l c our t e r r i n e xc l udi ng t he t e s t i mony o f Dr . M r i on C. Ha r pe r on t he i s s ue s of c a us a t i on

a

u n de r t he r e qui r e me nt s of § 29- 26- 115, Te nn. Code Ann. , 1 9 96?

II. W s t he t r i a l c our t ’ s s ua s pont e gr a nt of di r e c t e d

a

v e r di c t pr ope r unde r Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Ci vi l Pr oc e dur e 5 0 . 01?

I n Apr i l 1989 M . Sc ot t s ought t r e a t me nt f r om Dr .

s

Ca l i a , a p odi a t r i s t , t o c or r e c t a va r i e t y of a i l me nt s a f f l i c t i ng

he r f e e t . M . Sc ot t a gr e e d t o ha ve Dr . Ca l i a pe r f or m s ur ge r y on

s

he r f e e t . Dr . Ca l i a pe r f or me d f i ve s e pa r a t e s ur gi c a l pr oc e dur e s

o n e a c h of M . Sc ot t ’ s f e e t .

s M . Sc ot t c ont i nue d t o vi s i t Dr .

s

Ca l i a f or pos t - ope r a t i ve e va l ua t i ons . De s pi t e f ol l owi ng Dr .

Ca l i a ’ s i ns t r uc t i ons f or t he c a r e of he r s ur gi c a l wounds t ha t

r e ma i n e d a f t e r t he s ur ge r y, t he s ur gi c a l wound on he r r i ght gr e a t

t oe f a i l e d t o h e a l .

Ei ght mont hs a f t e r he r s ur ge r y, M . Sc ot t s ought t he

s

o p i n i o n of Dr . M r i on C. Ha r pe r , a n or t hope di s t a s s oc i a t e d wi t h

a

Va n d e r b i l t Hos pi t a l i n Na s hvi l l e , Te nne s s e e . Dr . Ha r pe r

p e r f o r me d a s e c ond s ur ge r y i n Fe br ua r y 1990 t o c omba t a n

i n f e c t i on t ha t ha d i nva de d t he bone of M . Sc ot t ’ s gr e a t r i ght

s

t oe . Dr . Ha r pe r a l s o l a t e r pe r f or me d a t hi r d s ur ge r y t o c l os e

t h e wo u nd on M . Sc ot t ’ s gr e a t r i ght t oe t ha t ha d be e n ope n s i n c e

s

t h e M y 1989 s ur ge r y pe r f or me d by Dr . Ca l i a .

a

The r e qui r e me nt s ne c e s s a r y f or a pl a i nt i f f t o e s t a bl i s h

a pr i ma f a c i e c a s e o f me di c a l ma l pr a c t i c e i s s e t out i n T. C. A.

2 9 - 2 6 - 1 1 5. W quot e t he pe r t i ne nt pr ovi s i ons a s f ol l ows :

e

29- 26- 115. Cl ai m ant ' s bur de n i n m pr ac t i c e al

a c t i on - - Expe r t t es t i mony - - Pr e s um i on of ne gl i ge nc e pt

- - Jur y i ns t r uc t i ons . - - ( a ) I n a ma l pr a c t i c e a c t i on, t h e c l a i ma nt s ha l l ha ve t he bur de n of pr ovi ng by e v i de nc e a s pr ovi de d by s ubs e c t i on ( b) :

( 1) The r e c ogni z e d s t a nda r d of a c c e pt a bl e p r of e s s i ona l pr a c t i c e i n t he pr of e s s i on a nd t he s p e c i a l t y t he r e of , i f a ny, t ha t t he de f e nda nt pr a c t i c e s i n t he c ommuni t y i n whi c h he pr a c t i c e s or i n a s i mi l a r c o mmuni t y a t t he t i me t he a l l e ge d i nj ur y or wr ongf ul a c t i on o c c ur r e d;

( 2) Tha t t he de f e nda nt a c t e d wi t h l e s s t ha n or f a i l e d t o a c t wi t h o r di na r y a nd r e a s ona bl e c a r e i n a c c or da nc e wi t h s uc h s t a nda r d; a nd

( 3) As a pr oxi ma t e r e s ul t of t he de f e nda nt ’ s n e gl i ge nt a c t or o mi s s i on, t h e pl a i nt i f f s uf f e r e d i n j ur i e s whi c h woul d not ot he r wi s e ha ve oc c ur r e d.

To s a t i s f y t he s t a t ut or y r e qui r e me nt s , M . Sc ot t ha d

s

Dr . I v a n Coope r , a podi a t r i s t s ur ge on f r om Ea s t Te nne s s e e ,

t es t i f y at t r i al . Dr . Coope r t e s t i f i e d t ha t Dr . Ca l i a br e a c he d

t h e s t a nda r d of c a r e f or podi a t r i s t s . Fi r s t , Dr . Coope r

t e s t i f i e d t ha t he br e a c he d t he s t a nda r d of c a r e by pe r f or mi ng t o o

ma n y s u r gi c a l pr oc e dur e s d ur i ng one ope r a t i on. Se c ond, Dr .

Co o p e r t e s t i f i e d t ha t he br e a c he d t he s t a nda r d of c a r e by not

t a k i n g a c ul t ur e t o de t e r mi ne i f a n i nf e c t i on wa s pr e s e nt i n t h e

o p e n wo u nd. Fi na l l y, Dr . Coope r t e s t i f i e d t ha t he br e a c he d t h e

s t a n d a r d of c a r e by not pe r f or mi ng a s e c ond s ur ge r y t o c ove r a n

e x p o s e d wound. Howe ve r , Dr . Coope r t e s t i f i e d t ha t he ha d onl y

s e e n M . Sc ot t on t wo oc c a s i ons a nd wa s not i n a pos i t i on t o s

t e s t i f y a bout a ny da ma ge s t ha t ma y ha ve r e s ul t e d f r om Dr . Ca l i a ' s

n e g l i g e nc e .

The pa r t i e s do not di s put e t ha t Dr . Coope r ’ s t e s t i mo n y

s a t i s f i e d t he s t a nda r d of c a r e r e qui r e me nt s s e t out i n T. C. A. 2 9 -

2 6 - 1 1 5 ( 1 ) a nd ( 2) , but t ha t hi s t e s t i mony di d not s a t i s f y t he

c a u s a t i on r e qui r e me nt s e t out i n T. C. A. 29- 26- 115( 3) . M . Sc ot t

s

a t t e mp t e d t o s a t i s f y t hi s s t a t ut or y r e qui r e me nt wi t h t he

t e s t i mo ny o f Dr . M r i on Ha r pe r who, a s s t a t e d e a r l i e r , be c a me M .

a s

Sc o t t ’ s t r e a t i ng p hys i c i a n. Dr . Ca l i a ma de a mot i on i n l i mi ne t o

e xc l u d e a ny r e f e r e nc e t o c a us a t i on a s i t r e l a t e s t o a ny a l l e ge d

d e vi a t i on o n t he pa r t o f Dr . Ca l i a be c a us e Dr . Ha r pe r r e a di l y

a d mi t t e d t ha t he l a c ke d a ny knowl e dge c onc e r ni ng t he r e c ogni z e d

s t a nd a r d o f a c c e pt a bl e , p r of e s s i ona l pr a c t i c e i n t he pr of e s s i o n

a n d s p e c i a l t y of podi a t r y. The Tr i a l Cour t gr a nt e d Dr . Ca l i a ’ s

mo t i o n i n l i mi ne a s t o s ome of Dr . Ha r pe r ' s t e s t i mony be c a us e h e

wa s u n f a mi l i a r wi t h t he s t a nda r d of c a r e . M . Sc ot t i ns i s t s t ha t

s

s h e c o u l d ha ve s a t i s f i e d t he c a us a t i on r e qui r e me nt t hr ough t he

d e p o s i t i on t e s t i mony of Dr . Ha r pe r .

Cont r a r y t o t he hol di ng of t he Tr i a l Cour t , a pl a i nt i f f

i n a me di c a l ma l pr a c t i c e s ui t ma y s a t i s f y t he c a us a t i on

r e q u i r e me nt f ound i n T. C. A. 29- 26- 115( 3) wi t h t e s t i mony f r om a

d o c t o r unf a mi l i a r wi t h t he s t a nda r d of c a r e . For e xa mpl e , a

d o c t o r , who i s unf a mi l i a r wi t h t he s t a nda r d of c a r e , ma y

n e ve r t h e l e s s t e s t i f y t ha t a s pe c i f i c a c t of t he de f e nda nt , s uc h

a s p r e s c r i bi ng a c e r t a i n dr ug t o whi c h t he pl a i nt i f f i s a l l e r g i c ,

c a u s e d t he pl a i nt i f f t o s uf f e r i nj ur i e s whi c h woul d not ha ve

o c c u r r e d i f t he pl a i nt i f f ha d not t a ke n t he dr ug. Thus , we mus t

r e v i e w t he de pos i t i on t e s t i mony of Dr . Ha r pe r t o de t e r mi ne

wh e t h e r t he Tr i a l Cour t pr ope r l y gr a nt e d a di r e c t e d ve r di c t f o r

Dr . Ca l i a .

Upon c ons i de r a t i on of a mot i on f or di r e c t e d ve r di c t ,

t he t r i a l c our t mus t l ook t o a l l t he e vi de nc e , t a ke t he mos t

l e g i t i ma t e vi e w of i t i n f a vor of t he oppone nt of t he mot i on, a n d

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandra J. Scott v. Dr. Gerald B. Calia, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Sandra J. Scott v. Dr. Gerald B. Calia (Sandra J. Scott v. Dr. Gerald B. Calia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Whittemore
442 S.W.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1969)
Lubbock Independent School Dist. v. Abernathy
1 S.W.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Leonard v. Gilreath
625 S.W.2d 722 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1981)