Sandra Folchi Godoy v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 654 F. App'x 288 (Sandra Folchi Godoy v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Sandra Winefred Folchi Godoy petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) summary affirmance without opinion of an Immigration Judge’s decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture relief. Godoy did not raise before the BIA any of the issues she raises here. “[F]ail-ure to raise an issue in an appeal to the BIA constitutes a failure to exhaust remedies with respect to that question and deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter.” Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Vargas v. U.S. Dep’t of Immigration & Naturalization, 831 F.2d 906, 907-08 (9th Cir. 1987)).
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
654 F. App'x 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-folchi-godoy-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.