Sandra Folchi Godoy v. Loretta E. Lynch

654 F. App'x 288
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 2016
Docket13-70800
StatusUnpublished

This text of 654 F. App'x 288 (Sandra Folchi Godoy v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandra Folchi Godoy v. Loretta E. Lynch, 654 F. App'x 288 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Sandra Winefred Folchi Godoy petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) summary affirmance without opinion of an Immigration Judge’s decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture relief. Godoy did not raise before the BIA any of the issues she raises here. “[F]ail-ure to raise an issue in an appeal to the BIA constitutes a failure to exhaust remedies with respect to that question and deprives this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter.” Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Vargas v. U.S. Dep’t of Immigration & Naturalization, 831 F.2d 906, 907-08 (9th Cir. 1987)).

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

***

xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F. App'x 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-folchi-godoy-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.