Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby, George R. Hunt, Robert Wargowski, Harlin Ross, Clayton A. Cramer, and the Town of Brookfield

857 F.2d 1175, 1988 WL 99227
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1988
Docket85-2950
StatusPublished

This text of 857 F.2d 1175 (Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby, George R. Hunt, Robert Wargowski, Harlin Ross, Clayton A. Cramer, and the Town of Brookfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandra C. Schultz and Robert C. Braun v. Russell Frisby, George R. Hunt, Robert Wargowski, Harlin Ross, Clayton A. Cramer, and the Town of Brookfield, 857 F.2d 1175, 1988 WL 99227 (7th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

This cause came before the court on remand from the United States Supreme Court. — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2495, 101 L.Ed.2d 420.

In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court reversing the en banc decision of this court, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granting the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary injunction is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the district court for any further proceedings deemed necessary, consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion, in accordance with the order of this court entered this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frisby v. Schultz
487 U.S. 474 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 F.2d 1175, 1988 WL 99227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-c-schultz-and-robert-c-braun-v-russell-frisby-george-r-hunt-ca7-1988.