Sandra Aguilar v. Loretta Lynch

624 F. App'x 213
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2015·No. 14-60741·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Sandra Marixa Aguilar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing as untimely her appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her request for asylum.

An. alien who seeks review of a final order of removal must file a petition with this court “not later than 30 days after the date of the' final order of removal.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); see 28 U.S.C. § 1631. “This deadline is jurisdictional.” Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir.2003). Because Aguilar’s petition for review was not filed within this time frame, it is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandra Aguilar v. Loretta Lynch, 624 F. App'x 213 (5th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 213 (Sandra Aguilar v. Loretta Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft
330 F.3d 672 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)