Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 354
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1956
DocketNo. 60218; protest 241713-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 354 (Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 354 (cusc 1956).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Ekaline F, which product is not obtained from any oil, fat, or fatty acid described in the Internal Revenue Code, but is derived in part from sperm oil, which is not covered by the statute, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 Cust. Ct. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoz-chemical-works-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1956.