Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States
26 Cust. Ct. 430, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Cust. Ct. 115 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 15, 1951·No. No. 55540; protest 130706-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cedilanid substance, ergotomin tartrate, and digilanid and scillaren substance the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 115, C. D. 1273), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 430, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 532 (cusc 1951).
26 Cust. Ct. 430 (Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 115 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)