Sandoval v. Lieff

705 So. 2d 717, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346, 1998 WL 65311
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1998·No. No. 97-1497·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hannewacker v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 419 So.2d 308 (Fla.1982); Adamo v. Manatee Condo., Inc., 548 So.2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Safeway Insurance Co. v. Saxon, 452 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandoval v. Lieff, 705 So. 2d 717, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1346, 1998 WL 65311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

705 So. 2d 717 (Sandoval v. Lieff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lieff v. Sandoval
726 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)