Sandoval v. Albright

94 P. 947, 14 N.M. 434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sandoval v. Albright. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 N.M. 345
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 1908·No. No. 1204·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

POPE, J.

(After stating the facts.) This is one of the fragments of a litigation which has been before this ■court in one form or another at almost every term, since 1904. The case at bar presents no features that have not been already fully considered and decided by this court. The power of the county commissioners to appoint Al-bright to the office of assessor was decided adversely to him. in Territory v. Albright, 78 Pac. 204, 12 N. M. 293. The eligibility of Sandoval to hold the office was decided favorably to Sandoval in the same case. The right of Sandoval, under these conditions, to recover the fees of the office, was settled in his favor, by the decision of this court in Sandoval v. Albright, No. 1190, 13 N. Mex. 64, decided January 13, 1908.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandoval v. Albright, 94 P. 947, 14 N.M. 434 (N.M. 1908).

94 P. 947 (Sandoval v. Albright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Ma. Sandoval v. Albright
78 P. 204 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1904)