Sandoval, Adrian Casas

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
DocketWR-81,545-01
StatusPublished

This text of Sandoval, Adrian Casas (Sandoval, Adrian Casas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandoval, Adrian Casas, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,545-01

EX PARTE ADRIAN CASAS SANDOVAL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-3998-06-B IN THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Sandoval v. State, No. 13-07-00392-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg Aug.

27, 2009) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his mandatory sentence of life without parole for a crime he

committed when he was a juvenile violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution 2

under Miller v. Alabama.1 He also alleges that Miller should be construed to apply retroactively and

that it should extend to juveniles sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. While this

application was pending in Hidalgo County, this Court decided that Miller applies retroactively to

a claim raised in a post-conviction proceeding. Ex parte Maxwell, 424 S.W.3d 66 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014).

The trial court has determined that Applicant’s sentence violates Miller. Relief is granted.

The sentence in Cause No. CR-3998-06-B in the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County is vacated,

and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Hidalgo County for further sentencing

proceedings to permit the factfinder to assess Applicant’s sentence at (1) life with the possibility of

parole or (2) life without parole after consideration of Applicant’s individual conduct, circumstances,

and character. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: August 20, 2014 Do not publish

1 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Maxwell, Ex Parte Terrell
424 S.W.3d 66 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sandoval, Adrian Casas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoval-adrian-casas-texcrimapp-2014.