Sandomenico v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sandomenico v. Town of North Hempstead

51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 564 (Sandomenico v. Town of North Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sandomenico v. Town of North Hempstead, 51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of North Hempstead appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 22, 1975, and made after a jury trial on the issue of liability only, which is in favor (a) of plaintiff against it and (b) of defendants Oerter against plaintiffs and it. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The jury verdict to the effect that the absence of the stop sign was the proximate cause of the accident was not against the weight of the evidence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of North Hempstead appeals from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 22, 1975, and made after a jury trial on the issue of liability only, which is in favor (a) of plaintiff against it and (b) of defendants Oerter against plaintiffs and it. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The jury verdict to the effect that the absence of the stop sign was the proximate cause of the accident was not against the weight of the evidence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandomenico-v-town-of-north-hempstead-nyappdiv-1976.