Sandoma Petroleum Co. v. Tow

1923 OK 565, 217 P. 412, 90 Okla. 276, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1179
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 24, 1923
Docket14367
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1923 OK 565 (Sandoma Petroleum Co. v. Tow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandoma Petroleum Co. v. Tow, 1923 OK 565, 217 P. 412, 90 Okla. 276, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1179 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

COCHRAN, J.

This is an action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission. The award 'was made by the Industrial Commission on March 29, 1923, and motion for a new trial was filed April 2, 1923, and overruled by the commission April 27, 1923. The petition for review was filed in this court on May 24, 1923. Section 7207, Comp. Stat. 1921, provides the method of reviewing awards of the Industrial Commission, and is as folows:

“The award or decision of the commission shall be final and conclusive upon all questions within its jurisdiction between the parties, unless within 30 days after a copy of such award or decision has been sent by said commission to the parties affected, an action is commenced in the Supreme Court of the state to review such award or decision. Said Supfeme Court shall have original jurisdiction of such action, and is authorized to prescribe rules for the commencement and trial of same. Such action shall be commenced by filing with the clerk of the Supreme Court a certified copy of the award or decision of the commission attached tó the petition by the complainant, wherein the complainant or petitioner shall make his assignments or specifications as to wherein said award is erroneous and illegal. * * *”

No motion for new trial is necessary or authorized under this statute and the 30-day'period within which to file petition for review begins to run from the date of the award, and the filing of the motion for new trial does not extend the time within which to commence proceedings for review. The petition not having been filed in this court wiTiin thirty days from the date of the award, the petition for review is dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and KANE. KENNA-MER, NICHOLSON, and HARRISON, ,JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Smith Welding & Fabrication
746 P.2d 168 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
BF Goodrich Company v. State Industrial Court
429 P.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1967)
Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling
1933 OK 481 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. State Industrial Com.
1931 OK 229 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Graver Corporation v. Cullum
1929 OK 66 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Oxford v. Texas Co.
1928 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Ford v. Sanders
1927 OK 372 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Eoff
1927 OK 229 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Knowles v. Whitehead Oil Co.
1926 OK 569 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 565, 217 P. 412, 90 Okla. 276, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoma-petroleum-co-v-tow-okla-1923.