Sandler v. Beigel Schy Lasky Cohen Rifkind & Hennessey
266 A.D.2d 76, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1999
StatusPublished
This text of 266 A.D.2d 76 (Sandler v. Beigel Schy Lasky Cohen Rifkind & Hennessey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sandler v. Beigel Schy Lasky Cohen Rifkind & Hennessey, 266 A.D.2d 76, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 13, 1998, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Cahn, J., without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 76, 698 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandler-v-beigel-schy-lasky-cohen-rifkind-hennessey-nyappdiv-1999.