Sandland v. Adams
2 How. Pr. 97
This text of 2 How. Pr. 97 (Sandland v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sandland v. Adams, 2 How. Pr. 97 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Held: that the copy affidavit merits served was not entitled in this suit, the plaintiff was another name. Plaintiff’s attorneys were regular in taking the inquest.
Motion denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandland-v-adams-nysupct-1846.