Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Sandifer v. . Foster

Sandifer v. . Foster

2 N.C. 237
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1795
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2 N.C. 237 (Sandifer v. . Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandifer v. . Foster, 2 N.C. 237 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).

Opinion

The river in this case must be considered as the boundary of Gee's patent. It has always been thus uniformly decided in our courts.

The jury so found, and there was judgment accordingly.

Cited: Hartsfield v. Westbrook, post, 258; Cherry v. Slade, 7 N.C. 85;Hurley v. Morgan, 18 N.C. 430; Slade v. Neal, 19 N.C. 62; Shultz v.Young, 25 N.C. 387; McPhaul v. Gilchrist, 29 N.C. 173; Literary Boardv. Clark, 31 N.C. 61; Baxter v. Wilson, 95 N.C. 143; Brown v. House,118 N.C. 878; Bowen v. Gaylord, 122 N.C. 820; Rowe v. Lumber Co.,133 N.C. 437; Whitaker v. Cover, 140 N.C. 284; Boyden v. Hagaman,169 N.C. 202; Power Co. v. Savage, 170 N.C. 629. *Page 185

(238)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose v. . R. G. Franklin
4 S.E.2d 876 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Brown v. . Smathers
126 S.E. 22 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Tallassee Power Co. v. Savage
170 N.C. 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Boyden v. . Hagaman
85 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Staub v. Hampton
117 Tenn. 706 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1906)
Whitaker v. Cover.
52 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
Bowen v. . Gaylord
29 S.E. 340 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
Pender v. . Coor
1 N.C. 228 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1802)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandifer-v-foster-ncsuperct-1795.